The Startup Metrics Mirage: When Big Numbers Tell Bigger Stories
Manavi Khandelwal, Kanav Bajaj
2/26/20262 min read
There is a running joke that the Indian startup world sometimes feels like Bollywood. Lots of drama, larger-than-life dreams, and scenes that look amazing on screen but do not always match reality. And just like Bollywood heroes often walk away from explosions without a scratch, some startups seem to walk away from losses by simply introducing new, creative metrics.
It is entertaining. It is impressive. But it also shows how much of the startup story today is driven not by what the business earns, but by how well the narrative is crafted.
The startup ecosystem loves numbers. Not just any numbers, but the kind that sound dramatic, ambitious, and almost cinematic. Open any startup presentation or earnings report and you will immediately see huge market estimates, massive transaction values, and profitability adjusted in ways that make everything look brighter than it truly is.
One of the most popular tools in this storytelling playbook is TAM, or Total Addressable Market. It always appears enormous because it is designed to. If a company sells even a basic consumer product, suddenly everyone in the country becomes a potential customer. It looks exciting on a slide, but only a small fraction of that so-called massive market ever converts into real sales. The rest is simply theoretical.
Another crowd-pleasing metric is GMV or GOV. It gives the impression of scale and success. But GMV is similar to a waiter telling his friends he “handled” fifty thousand rupees worth of food tonight. Sounds fantastic, but the money does not belong to him. GMV measures the total value of transactions on a platform, not what the company actually keeps. Once discounts, cancellations and commissions are deducted, the impressive figure looks very different.
Then comes the final flourish: adjusted profitability. This is where companies start removing costs that make them look unprofitable. ESOP expenses vanish. Corporate overheads are excluded. One-time losses are ignored. If individuals used the same approach, everyone would appear financially stable. Without rent, food and transport expenses, anyone can claim a positive monthly balance.
None of this means that startups are dishonest. Many genuinely invest heavily in growth and need time before profits appear. But it does raise an important point about how modern startups present themselves. Metrics today are crafted to inspire confidence, win funding, and keep the story moving. Investors want growth. Founders want belief. Markets want something exciting to talk about.
Eventually, however, the glamorous numbers fade and the focus shifts to fundamentals. At that point, only one thing matters. Cash. Real earnings. Sustainable profit. Storytelling stops, and substance takes over.
The real lesson is simple. Numbers can be impressive, inspiring and sometimes even entertaining. But understanding what those numbers actually represent is what separates excitement from insight. In a world filled with dramatic metrics, clarity might just be the most underrated skill.
